Rather than understand art as cultural accomplishment, Elizabeth Grosz argues that it is born from the intensities of chaos and disruptive forms of sexual selec. CHAOS,. TERRITORY, ART. Deleuze and the Framing of the Earth. Elizabeth Grosz develop a nonaesthetic philosophy for art, a philosophy appropriate. Elizabeth Grosz, Chaos, Territory, Art: Deleuze and the Framing of the Earth, Irvington, NY: Columbia University Press,
|Published (Last):||18 October 2018|
|PDF File Size:||11.40 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.98 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Dec 14, Chaoa rated it it was amazing. While this process culminates, as does the book, in “the political overcoming of the present and helps bring a new, rich, and resonating future into being”what this future might actually be is, unfortunately, anybody’s guess. In this sense, her argument is as affectual as it is intellectual, and so explores a way of “doing” philosophy that is both “artistic” and “feminist.
Chaos, Territory, Art: Deleuze and the Framing of the Earth
Grosz states that “the common ground for all the arts is the rhythmic, irreducibly durational universe of invisible, inaudible forces whose order isn’t experientially discernable and is thus experienced or lived, at best, as chaotic” p. According to Grosz, art is the way in which life experiments with materiality, or nature, in order to bring about change.
Sign in to use this feature. Grosz argues that art is not tied to the predictable and known but chaoss new futures not contained in the present.
Andrew Conio – – Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 3 1: Alison rated it it was amazing Mar 07, Science Logic and Mathematics. Noah rated it it was amazing Oct 25, The Logic of Sensation.
Try the Kindle edition and experience these great reading features: Ekizabeth regarding our most cultured human accomplishments as the result of the excessive, nonfunctional forces of sexual attraction and seduction, Grosz encourages us to see art as a kind of bodily enhancement or mode of sensation enabling living bodies to experience and transform the universe.
Kathleen rated it it was amazing Feb 19, Drew rated it really liked it Feb 07, Tough to rate this, because I plowed att the bits I wasn’t particularly interested in Grosz’s thoughts on Darwin’s theory of music’s origin as a masculine sexual lure to get to the bit I was interested in: See and discover other items: See all 3 reviews.
If you truly care about what you see, what, you listen to, what you feel, what you smell, what you taste. Grosz was awarded a Ph.
By regarding our most cultured human accomplishments as the result of the excessive, nonfunctional forces of sexual attraction and seduction, Grosz encourages us to see art as a kind of bodily enhancement or mode of sensation enabling living bodies to experience and transform the universe. Forged from a partnership between a university press and a library, Project MUSE is a trusted part of the academic and scholarly community it serves.
Elizabeth Grosz is a professor at Duke University. Amazon Drive Cloud storage from Amazon. Bobby George rated it it was amazing Jul 22, Leonard Lawlor – – In Daniel W. She approaches art as a form of erotic expression connecting sensory richness with primal desire, and in doing so, finds that the meaning of art comes from the intensities and sensations it inspires, not just its intention and aesthetic.
Instead of treating art as a unique creation that requires reason and refined taste to appreciate, Elizabeth Grosz argues that art-especially architecture, music, and painting-is born from the disruptive forces of sexual selection.
Elizabeth Grosz, Chaos, Territory, Art: Deleuze and the Framing of the Earth – PhilPapers
Oct 24, Gabriel rated it it was amazing. Christopher Jung rated it really liked it Oct 26, Buy the selected items together This item: Write a customer review. Basma Abdallah Uraiqat territody it it was amazing Oct 02, Grosz’s attempt to define art is heroic.
The Earth, a People, Art.