This is what Derrida calls the parergon: “Neither work (ergon) nor outside the work (hors d’oeuvre), neither inside nor outside, neither above nor below. Despite its name, the Deconstruction that is associated with Derrida is not an . The parergon is the frame, the boundary between the art work. In this respect, the study follows on from. Derrida’s famous deconstruction of Kant’s parergon (frame) in his Critique of. Judgement. Derrida’s work exposes what.

Author: Shajas Basar
Country: Norway
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Science
Published (Last): 26 November 2004
Pages: 346
PDF File Size: 8.60 Mb
ePub File Size: 18.72 Mb
ISBN: 327-4-92003-625-3
Downloads: 71185
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Durisar

The term initially appeared in Greek in Philotheou Parergaa text conceived between and by the Voivode of Wallachia, Nikolaos Mavrokordatos, as a guide derrkda conduct for his son.

When looking at a framed painting, the frame is part of the wall, whereas when looking at the wall, derrdia frame is part of the painting. This assumes that we reach agreement about what we understand by the word art. If the terms cannot be separated or opposed in any final way, then their meanings are also interdependent and inseparable. Derdida you have found this material useful, please give credit to.

Contemporary art discourses tend to accept that the status of a work of art as art is a pregiven condition, and analyze how the work functions retrospectively.

Jaques Derrida excerpt from Parergon, The Truth in Painting (1978)

How to treat this book. This view of aesthetics allows one to view these objects such as the garments on a statue per say as a detachable accessory as it is not organically belonging to the body.

A Note on Parerga Parerga are not simply notes; they derriva be thought of as the extremities of a body, without which the pareron is truncated.

For example, what is intrinsic to a sculpture with drapery? Half a century later, inArthur Schopenhauer published his Parerga and Parelipomenaa work that, Schopenhauer explained, was subsidiary to his other, more systematic works, could not find a place in those other works, and dealt primarily with philosophical issues that derrids the subject with regard to the legal system, death, and existence.

Jacques Derrida and Deconstruction | Art History Unstuffed

But what is the frame itself? The University of Chicago Press, 9.

Therefore it is not surprising that more and more artists have been turning to the question of context as the main preoccupation of their artistic activities. In other words, the object had to be a form of knowledge of the object itself, not derirda mental acts which cognitively construct it. Thus, the parergon participates in the act of reflective thought, in the act of reflective faith, through the seemingly endless segmentation of the commentary on religion by Kant.


A Note on Parerga

Contrary to the notion of a discourse that assumes art gives access to the realm of timeless and disinterestedness values, any discourse on art is always and inevitably bound up with interests that belong to the outside of art. Since these frames are not closed, the viewer is able to view their cross sections and recognize that they are extrusions of architectural silhouettes, such as the Hagia Sophia in Istanbul and the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.

Each part constitutes a parergon that concerns a parergon. His major target was the hierarchy between speech and writing, in which speech was presumed to have preceded writing, this giving to speech a false priority and the false presumption of origin.

What about the frame around a painting? It seems appropriate, then, to seek to pareegon the physical and cultural contexts which allow the work to be perceived as work, instead of looking for artistic qualities that exist within it inherently.

Notify me of new comments via email. Deconstruction does not appeal to a higher logical principle or superior reason, something which Derrida considered to be metaphysical. The Truth in Painting. Although enclosing pzrergon were used in the art of Ancient Egyptians, it was in Europe that picture frames became a widely accepted norm in painting. Page number of 2.

What is to read this book.

Derrida charged that Husserl created a structure of alterity or the otherness of the meaning or self. Like an accessory that one is obliged to to welcome, neither wholly outside nor inside. Where does it come from?

He also suggests books as being this complicated object wheres one cannot depict their ends, their frames. Whenever deconstruction finds a nutshell—a secure axiom or a pithy maxim—the very idea is to crack it open and disturb this tranquility. You are commenting using your Twitter account. Living presence, according to Derrida, is always inhabited by difference.

Such analyses do not attempt to provide prescriptive frameworks, but rather try to understand the specific ideas and relations represented and produced through the work.

University of Chicago Press. Both texts make clear that parerga denote a supplemental and instructional gesture that accompanies a main text pareergon narrative but does so in derrlda resolutely critical manner.

Jump to From Now On…. Despite its name, the Deconstruction that is associated with Derrida is not an act of destruction or a breaking up, instead Deconstruction, like Structuralism is an activity or performance. To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Therefore for Kant, the parergon is a hybrid of inside and outside, frame, clothing, column, and there is no deciding what is intrinsic to artwork and what belongs to the outside frame.


Dangerous Citizens Search Search. It seems more productive to keep the fluid nature of these framing devices in mind, and to realize that the same devices can be used in framing different ideologies. Should the body be considered as autonomous, that is self-sufficient without the drapery, or is the drapery intrinsic to the work of art itself? Here Derrida is expressing that interrelated dynamics that can exist within media and objects.

This is where it seems to get problematic for Derrida and parergin myself. Perhaps, then, the function of parerga will be to draw attention parergob the act of framing itself, rather than what is derroda framed. Parerga are intimately connected with the development of the Western critical tradition, encompassing the historical pareegon discursive development of social and parergonn thought that is the backdrop for the entire discipline of anthropology, indeed, that has engendered anthropology as an inquiry and a discipline, from its methodology to its epistemology and content.

Parerga are not simply notes; they should be thought of as the extremities of a body, without which the text paerrgon truncated. To derridaa this differently, so to speak, difference creates an endlessly deferred meaning as the self and the object oscillate, unable to fix a position.

Columbia University Press, This logical derrdia which deconstructs. Derrida would be compelled to deconstruct such a proposition. They are notations to the text that make the text show its complexities, as they bring into the main narrative the realities of multiple positions, make interventions that show that there is no stability in this history, that the story itself constantly shifts ground, that any attempt to produce a cohesive narration, an Ur-text of the history of the Left in Greece, will always draw voices from the margins that will demand to be heard and will demand that the nuances they offer be taken into account.